15 top U.S. states for smart grid policy, customer engagement, and technology including GIS

The Grid Wise Alliance (GWA) and Smart Grid Policy Center (SGPC), the research arm of the GridWise Alliance, have created the Grid Modernization Index (GMI),  which has been applied to rank U.S. states, based on their grid modernization policies and activities.  The GMI ranking system uses a set of criteria to evaluate the progress and impacts of  improvements to the U.S. electric infrastructure. This Grid Modernization Index consists of three components:

  1. Policy – State policies and regulatory mechanisms that encourage grid modernization investment;
  2. Customer Engagement – Investments in customer empowering capabilities
  3. Grid Operations – Investments in grid modernization technologies and capabilities.  This includes advanced GIS and GIS integration with the asset management system

Data was collected for 41 states and the District of Columbia.  A report  released by the GWA and the SGPC lists the 15 states that scored the highest, based on criteria defined for each of the three component areas.

  1. California
  2. Texas
  3. Maryand
  4. Delaware
  5. Pennsylvania
  6. Arizona
  7. DC
  8. Ohio,
  9. Nevada
  10. Illinois
  11. Florida
  12. Oklahoma
  13. Virginia
  14. Vermont
  15. Maine

Grid modernization scores 2013 Gridwise AllianceThe report also identifies some of the common characteristics of the highest scoring states.

  • States with retail choice, belong to Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) or Independent System Operators (ISOs), and have Renewable Portfolio Standards tend to have hgh GMI scores.
  • States that received ARRA Smart Grid Investment Grants tend to have high scores for all three components (Policy, Customer Engagement and Grid Operations) of the GMI.
  • No correlation was found between high GMI scores and electricity rates. In other words the price of electricity is not a primary driver for grid modernization.
  • States with high GMI scores also score higher in addressing cybersecurity and data privacy than other states.
  • States with high GMI scores tend to score higher in engaging customers
  • States with high GMI scores tend to deploy more sensors and advanced modeling tools for both transmission and distribution grids.
  • The 15 highest-scoring states all have deployed smart meters to some degree to their residential and small commercial customers. Ten of these 15 states have installed smart meters for at least 60 percent of their consumers.

Grid modernization technologies and capabilities

The technologies and capabilities that were considered for the GMI to be part of a modern smart grid include

  • Automated Meter Reading (AMR)
  • Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI)
  • Advanced, communicating transmission sensors,such as:
  • PhasorMeasurement Units (PMUs)
  • Dynamic line rating
  • Fault indicators
  • Transformer monitoring

Capabilties tha were used to assess states include

  • Energy storage is leveraged as a tool for system planning?
  • Price-responsive and/or ride-through (voltage and/or frequency) capable microgrids exist ?
  • Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) is integrated with other utility systems to increase
    benefits, such as outage detection, remote connect/disconnect, tamper detection, power quality monitoring, and more ?
  • Distributed Automation (DA) deployed at: substations; line switches; circuit ties ?
  • Distribution Management System (DMS) functionality is integrated with sensor data, capacitor bank monitoring and/or control, voltage regulator monitoring and/or control, or storage charge and/or discharge?
  • Probabilistic planning–based on new data from equipment and sensors – is being used in distribution, transmission, or customer interactions and/or across the enterprise for increased system value?
  • “Self-healing” (i.e., to autonomously operate and/or reconfigure) capability is deployed ?
  • Advanced Geographical Information System (GIS) capabilities and functionality are deployed ?
  • GIS is integrated with Asset Management (AM)?
  • Advanced visualization tools are being used ?
Geoff Zeiss

Geoff Zeiss

Geoff Zeiss has more than 20 years experience in the geospatial software industry and 15 years experience developing enterprise geospatial solutions for the utilities, communications, and public works industries. His particular interests include the convergence of BIM, CAD, geospatial, and 3D. In recognition of his efforts to evangelize geospatial in vertical industries such as utilities and construction, Geoff received the Geospatial Ambassador Award at Geospatial World Forum 2014. Currently Geoff is Principal at Between the Poles, a thought leadership consulting firm. From 2001 to 2012 Geoff was Director of Utility Industry Program at Autodesk Inc, where he was responsible for thought leadership for the utility industry program. From 1999 to 2001 he was Director of Enterprise Software Development at Autodesk. He received one of ten annual global technology awards in 2004 from Oracle Corporation for technical innovation and leadership in the use of Oracle. Prior to Autodesk Geoff was Director of Product Development at VISION* Solutions. VISION* Solutions is credited with pioneering relational spatial data management, CAD/GIS integration, and long transactions (data versioning) in the utility, communications, and public works industries. Geoff is a frequent speaker at geospatial and utility events around the world including Geospatial World Forum, Where 2.0, MundoGeo Connect (Brazil), Middle East Spatial Geospatial Forum, India Geospatial Forum, Location Intelligence, Asia Geospatial Forum, and GITA events in US, Japan and Australia. Geoff received Speaker Excellence Awards at GITA 2007-2009.

View article by Geoff Zeiss

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*