Automated code-checking: Review of 28 national, state, city and third-party BIM standards and guidelines

Checking regulatory compliance for building permitting remains a tedious, time-consuming and costly process. While the critical importance of timely, accurate, and uniform code review has been an important goal of regulatory agencies for some time (for over a decade in the case of Singapore), only recently has the industry started to experience a paradigm shift.

Fiatech is planning to permanently transform the way construction project code reviews are conducted. The AutoCodes Project aims to make the building regulatory process  faster, more uniform, and more competitive through automated code-check technology based on virtual 3D construction models or BIMs (Building Information Models).  The AutoCodes Project guideline aims at creating a consistent and reliable modeling methodology to streamline processes and result in faster, more accurate code checking.

One of the activities of the AutoCodes project was to commission a review of existing, publicly available Building Information Modeling (BIM) standards and guidelines including those that are in development and completed.  The research goal is to establish a foundation for developing modeling requirements and methodologies for automated code checking.

The research team reviewed 28 BIM standards and guidelines (see listing below), including eight that were developed by third-party organizations, for example, the National BIM Standard developed by the buildingSMART alliance, and 20 by owner organizations, for example, the General Services Administration’s (GSA) BIM Guide Series. Eight out of the 28 documents are considered standards and 20 are considered guidelines.

None of the standards and guidelines reviewed define detailed requirements for automated code checking.  However, 15 recommend automated code checking/validation as a potential BIM use.  For example, the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) of Singapore launched CORENET (Construction and Real Estate NETwork) e-submission for the building and construction industry in 2001. BCA began accepting BIM e-submission (architectural, structural & MEP) in 2011.

Building permitting in Singapore

Singapore is an interesting example because its stated goal is to make its permitting process faster than anywhere else in the world.  As a result, in many ways Singapore is leading the world in making the building permitting process more efficient.

BIM Singapore e-submissionThe Building and Construction Authority (BCA) led a multi-agency effort in 2008 to implement the world’s first BIM electronic submission (e-submission).  The BIM e-submission system streamlines the process for regulatory submission.  The process of moving to electronic submissions took about four years to complete.

In 2010 the BCA implemented the BIM Roadmap with the aim that 80% of the construction industry will use BIM by 2015. This is part of the government’s plan to improve the construction industry’s productivity by up to 25% over the next decade.

Digital signatures are legal in Singapore.  In many jurisdictions around the world, engineering and architectural drawings submitted to a municipal government require a signature or signatures of a licensed professional engineer (P.E.), in ink on a piece of paper.

Digital submissions are mandatory in Singapore.  Initially Singapore’s e-submission system meant that making a submission for a building permit required submitting 2D DWG, DGN, DXF, DWF, or PDF files.

The BCA is responsible for building permits in Singapore.  When a submission is received, it is reviewed by 16 government agencies, but BCA has the final authority to grant or reject the submission or ask for clarifications or modification.  Initially e-submission required 2D drawings with layers defined according to a BCA standard. 

But Singapore is moving rapidly toward building information models (BIM).  Project teams only need to submit one building model, which contains all of the information needed to meet the requirements of a regulatory agency.  In 2010, nine regulatory agencies accepted architectural BIM 3D models for approval through e-submission. This was followed by the acceptance of mechanical, electrical and plumbing (MEP) and structural BIM models in 2011. To date, more than 200 projects have made BIM e-submissions.

BIM standards and guidelines reviewed

Third-Party Organizations in the United States

National BIM Standard – United StatesTM

US

May, 2012

buildingSMART alliance (bSa)

Standard

E202 – 2008 BIM Protocol Exhibit

US

Sep, 2008

American Institute of Architects (AIA)

Guideline

The Contractor’s Guide to BIM (Edition 1)

US

Sep, 2006

Associated General Contractors of America (AGC)

Guideline

Third-Party Organizations in other Countries

NATSPEC National BIM Guide

AUSTRALIA

Sep, 2011

NATSPEC

Guideline

AEC (UK) BIM Protocols

UK

Sep, 2012

AEC (UK)

Guideline

Common BIM Requirement 2012 (COBIM)

FINLAND

Mar, 2012

buildingSMART Finland

Standard

BoligBIM (BIM Manual)

NORWAY

Nov, 2011

Boligprodusentene (Norwegian Home Builders Association)

Guideline

BIM Project Specification

CHINA

Jun, 2011

Hong Kong Institute of Building Information Modeling

Guideline

 

Federal Governments

The USACE BIM Road Map (ERDC TR-06-10)

US

Oct,2006

USACE

Guideline

Minimum Modeling Matrix (M3)

US

Sep, 2013

USACE

Standard

GSA BIM Guide

US

2006-2012

GSA

Guideline

The VA BIM Guide

US

Apr, 2010

VA

Guideline

ATTACHMENT F” — BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM) REQUIREMENTS

US

Apr, 2011

AFCEE

Standard

Singapore BIM Guide

SGP

May, 2012

BCA

Guideline

CORENET BIM e-submission Guidelines

SGP

Jan, 2010

BCA

Guideline

 

 

State/Local Governments

State of Ohio Building Information Modeling Protocol

US

Oct, 2012

State of Ohio

Guideline

Texas Facilities Commission Professional Architectural/Engineering Guidelines

US

Apr, 2012

State of Texas

Guideline

GSFIC BIM Guide – Series 01 Model Analysis and Validation

US

Jun, 2011

Georgia State

Guideline

DSF BIM Guidelines & Standards

US

Jul, 2009

State of Wisconsin

Standard

BIM Development Criteria and Standards for Design & Construction Projects (aka “CoSA BIM Standards”)

US

Jan, 2011

City of San Antonio

Standard

NYC BIM Guidelines

US

Jul, 2012

New York City

Guideline

 

 

Higher Educational Institution

BIM Project Execution Planning Guide

US

May, 2011

Penn State

Guideline

MIT CAD & BIM Guidelines & BIM Execution Plan

US

Apr, 2012

MIT

Guideline

Georgia Tech BIM Requirements & Guidelines for Architects, Engineers and Contractors

US

Sep, 2011

Georgia Tech

Guideline

USC BIM Guidelines

US

Apr, 2012

USC

Guideline

IU BIM Guidelines & Standards for Architects, Engineers, and Contractors

US

Jul, 2012

IU

Guideline

SDCCD BIM Standards for Architects, Engineers & Contractors

US

Jan, 2012

SDCCD

Guideline

Attachment D – BIM Execution Plan

US

Mar, 2012

Texas A&M

Guideline

Attachment G – University of Washington CAD and BIM Standards, PDF Requirements, and CAD Compliance Review Submittals

US

Apr, 2012

UW

Standard

ACCD BIM Design-Bid-Build Standards

US

Jun, 2011

LACCD

Standard

LACCD BIM Design-Build Standards

US

Jun, 2010

LACCD

Standard

 

 

Geoff Zeiss

Geoff Zeiss

Geoff Zeiss has more than 20 years experience in the geospatial software industry and 15 years experience developing enterprise geospatial solutions for the utilities, communications, and public works industries. His particular interests include the convergence of BIM, CAD, geospatial, and 3D. In recognition of his efforts to evangelize geospatial in vertical industries such as utilities and construction, Geoff received the Geospatial Ambassador Award at Geospatial World Forum 2014. Currently Geoff is Principal at Between the Poles, a thought leadership consulting firm. From 2001 to 2012 Geoff was Director of Utility Industry Program at Autodesk Inc, where he was responsible for thought leadership for the utility industry program. From 1999 to 2001 he was Director of Enterprise Software Development at Autodesk. He received one of ten annual global technology awards in 2004 from Oracle Corporation for technical innovation and leadership in the use of Oracle. Prior to Autodesk Geoff was Director of Product Development at VISION* Solutions. VISION* Solutions is credited with pioneering relational spatial data management, CAD/GIS integration, and long transactions (data versioning) in the utility, communications, and public works industries. Geoff is a frequent speaker at geospatial and utility events around the world including Geospatial World Forum, Where 2.0, MundoGeo Connect (Brazil), Middle East Spatial Geospatial Forum, India Geospatial Forum, Location Intelligence, Asia Geospatial Forum, and GITA events in US, Japan and Australia. Geoff received Speaker Excellence Awards at GITA 2007-2009.

View article by Geoff Zeiss

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*