Reducing electrical demand through energy efficient buildings

I heard a very interesting presentation on energy modeling for buildings with a focus on reducing electrical load at the GORUG meeting here in Ottawa.  Energy efficient building are becoming a priority for many utilities in the U.S., Germany and other locations.

Jean Carriere, an energy modeling specialist at 3D Energy Ltd, gave an insightful overview of what’s involved in energy modeling from the point of view of a designer who is familiar with building information modeling (BIM).  The kind of design decisions that energy modeling helps with are

  • How much energy should my building use ?
  • Could I power it with solar PV or wind (Ontario has a feed-in-tariff program that encourages small scale renewable energy development) ?
  • How much insulation is cost effective ?
  • How sensitive is my building to changes in weather ?

Compliance

The motivations for conducting an energy analysis include the revised Ontario Building Code, LEED and other types of certification.  In Ontario, new buildings with 40% or more external glazing are required to conduct an energy assessment. After January 1, 2013 new buildings will have to exceed ASHRAE 90.1-2010.  In addition the High Performance New Buildings program rewards builders with incentives for offsetting the cost of energy-efficiency measures.  According to Jean you get compensated for every kW saved.

I blogged previously about a new LEED program fro commercial buildings focussed on demand response and reducing peak electric power usage.

An energy analysis allows you to determine how much energy your building will consume in a year, cost effective insulation and glazing, and other things that you can do as part of the building design to opimize energy usage.  An energy analysis requires a lot of data and according to Jean inputing the data is still a very manual process that takes more time than it should.  Simulation applications allow you to include local environmental conditions and conduct thermal modeling, daylight and airflow simulations.  Thermal modeling includes energy consumption, thermal comfort, CO2 emissions, renewable energy integration, and electric power load. Natural lighting includes visual comfort (glare) and the reduction of energy use through natural lighting.  Airflow silumation includes external wind simulation, internal airflow simulation, clean room ventilation, and reduction in electrical load as a result of using natural ventilation.

DSC01228abWorkflow

Jean devoted most of his talk to the workflow he uses to conduct an energy analysis.  In most projects he is brought in after the building has been designed which significantly limits the opportunity for optimizing the design of the building for energy usage.  He typically starts of with the architect’s BIM model and a database containing information about building elements as well as local envrionmental conditions. 

The frist thing he does is to create a parallel model, which is a simplified BIM model derived from the architect’s model that contains the key elements that are required for the energy analysis usch as simplified walls and floors, room bounding elements, complete volumes, and window frames and curtain walls.  He exports the simplified model as gbXML to an energy analysis package and runs a simulation or several simulations if he is able to consider alternative designs.  The simulations generate a lot of data which he analyzes. 

Finally, he uses a visualization based around the BIM model to communicate the conclusions derived from the analyses.

Standards

Jean repeatedly emphasized how standards, for interoperability like gbXML and for classifying building elements in BIM models, could contribute to streamlining the workflow for enegy analyses.  He specifically mentioned Industry Foundation Classes (IFC) and Zero Energy Performance Index (zEPI), and it would seem that other standards for classifying elemnts in BIM models such as COBie and Omniclass could play a role in this as well.

Geoff Zeiss

Geoff Zeiss

Geoff Zeiss has more than 20 years experience in the geospatial software industry and 15 years experience developing enterprise geospatial solutions for the utilities, communications, and public works industries. His particular interests include the convergence of BIM, CAD, geospatial, and 3D. In recognition of his efforts to evangelize geospatial in vertical industries such as utilities and construction, Geoff received the Geospatial Ambassador Award at Geospatial World Forum 2014. Currently Geoff is Principal at Between the Poles, a thought leadership consulting firm. From 2001 to 2012 Geoff was Director of Utility Industry Program at Autodesk Inc, where he was responsible for thought leadership for the utility industry program. From 1999 to 2001 he was Director of Enterprise Software Development at Autodesk. He received one of ten annual global technology awards in 2004 from Oracle Corporation for technical innovation and leadership in the use of Oracle. Prior to Autodesk Geoff was Director of Product Development at VISION* Solutions. VISION* Solutions is credited with pioneering relational spatial data management, CAD/GIS integration, and long transactions (data versioning) in the utility, communications, and public works industries. Geoff is a frequent speaker at geospatial and utility events around the world including Geospatial World Forum, Where 2.0, MundoGeo Connect (Brazil), Middle East Spatial Geospatial Forum, India Geospatial Forum, Location Intelligence, Asia Geospatial Forum, and GITA events in US, Japan and Australia. Geoff received Speaker Excellence Awards at GITA 2007-2009.

View article by Geoff Zeiss

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*